“Listless at the plate, ineffective on the mound and sloppy defensively, the loss made the Mets 0-10 to start homestands this season.”-Dan Martin, New York Post
Couldn’t have said it better myself Dan. Hopefully, we’ll see a better effort today.
“Listless at the plate, ineffective on the mound and sloppy defensively, the loss made the Mets 0-10 to start homestands this season.”-Dan Martin, New York Post
Couldn’t have said it better myself Dan. Hopefully, we’ll see a better effort today.
Before we go any further, I need you to do two things.
This article reeks of a setup. It reads as if Puma went fishing for something “controversial”, took a portion of what Pelfrey gave him, fed it to the anonymous Met in the piece, and got a reaction he could go to print with.
Take a look at the state of the 2011 Mets and convince me I’m wrong.
What in the world can the media write about to obtain top advertising dollars?
I will give Puma some credit. He does attempt to be fair by including Pelf’s approval of the organization’s future direction, and his desire to remain a Met.
Shame on the anonymous Met quoted in the piece. Regardless of how you feel about how well Pelfrey has performed this season, you should know better than to go off on him in front of a reporter/reporters. Surely you knew said reporter’s motive was to create a controversy to write about. You flat-out have to be smarter than that.
That being said, this is much a do about nothing. Don’t take the bait.
For the first time in quite some time I was disappointed with SNY’s Gary Cohen and Ron Darling. I stopped listening to last night’s telecast right before Pelf got drilled with the line drive. Turned the volume off and just watched. It troubled me that no one seemed to pick up that the quote attributed to Pelf was clearly a portion of a larger conversation.
Don’t worry Gary and Ron, you’re still the best in the biz, no one’s perfect.
Don’t get me wrong, Pelf shouldn’t have started talking about this year’s playoff hopes not being realistic. However, I don’t feel it’s fair to bash him without being able to read the entire statement/quote.
Again, why aren’t more people bothered by the “anonymous” teammate?
For the record, here’s Pelfrey’s thoughts about the quote provided by ESPN New York:
As for his comments in the Post, Pelfrey said his thoughts were taken out of context and misinterpreted during what he thought was a positive conversation.
“I didn’t think I said a negative thing,” he said. “That is why I was shocked.”
I always get a kick out of the New York Post’s headlines. I envision their editing meetings going something like this:
“Alright, does anyone have any ideas for tonight’s headline? Bernie?”
“Um, how about “Met’s Lose?””
“I like where your head is at Bernie, but we just used that one against Oakland. Barry?”
“How does, “Met’s Defeated” sound boss?”
“Ooh. I think we’re close but not quite there. Bobby?”
“I’ve got it! “Bad Start”. It’s like a double entendre because Pelfrey had a bad start and it was a bad way to begin the series!”
“Perfect! Mission accomplished! Nice work gentlemen!”
I’m not sure which is worse. The fact that the New York Post recycles the “Bad Start” headline when Big Pelf has issues, or the fact that I didn’t realize the fact that I made fun of it back on April second.
Check out my post from April 2nd below to see what I mean:
April 2, 2011
From the people that brought you The Sky Is Blue and Don’t Run With Scissors…..
Thanks New York Post. Riveting.